lsm/hutool
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitee.com/dromara/hutool.git synced 2025-04-05 17:37:59 +08:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

1.修复忘了timeZone的问题。2.完善单元测试。

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
hellozrh 2024-06-13 15:16:18 +08:00
parent 29a6cba58d
commit 7232706ca6
2 changed files with 27 additions and 12 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
hutool-core/src/main/java/cn/hutool/core/date/DateUtil.java
View File

@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ public class DateUtil extends CalendarUtil {
if (date instanceof DateTime) {
timeZone = ((DateTime) date).getTimeZone();
}
return format(date, FastDateFormat.getInstance(format));
return format(date, FastDateFormat.getInstance(format, timeZone));
}
/**

37
hutool-core/src/test/java/cn/hutool/core/date/DateUtilTest.java
View File

@ -1188,25 +1188,40 @@ public class DateUtilTest {
public void formatSpeedTest(){
Date value = new Date();
long t0 = System.currentTimeMillis();
FastDateFormat.getInstance("YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS");
//此处先加载FastDateFormat对象，保存到FastDateFormat.CACHE中
//解决后面两个for循环中保存到FastDateFormat对象创建未时差异的问题。
FastDateFormat.getInstance("YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS");
long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
String strTime = null;
for(int i=0; i<5000; i++){
strTime = DateUtil.format(value, "YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS");
for(int i=0; i<50000; i++){
strTime = DateUtil.format(value, "YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS");
}
System.out.println("format="+strTime);
long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i=0; i<5000; i++){
strTime = FastDateFormat.getInstance("YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS").format(value);
for(int i=0; i<50000; i++){
strTime = FastDateFormat.getInstance("YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS").format(value);
}
System.out.println("FastDateFormat="+strTime);
long t3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("t1-t0="+(t1-t0));
System.out.println("t2-t1="+(t2-t1));
System.out.println("t3-t2="+(t3-t2));
long initTime = t1 - t0;
long formtTime1 = t2 - t1;
long formatTime2 = t3 - t2;
//此处仍然不明白，两个for循环实际执行format方法都一样，为什么第1个for时间大致是第2个for的3倍。
Assert.assertTrue(formtTime1 > formatTime2);
/**
* System.out.println("t1-t0="+(t1-t0));
* System.out.println("t2-t1="+(t2-t1));
* System.out.println("t3-t2="+(t3-t2));
*
* 由日志可以看出，第1个for时间大致是第2个for的3倍
*
* t1-t0=46
* t2-t1=65
* t3-t2=25
*/
}
}